Skip to content
Tags

The Case Against Christianity 1: Basis of Christian Belief

07/11/2011

Martin is trying to evaluate the reasons people give for believing Christianity is true, including epistemic reasons and moral reasons. I don’t think he makes a good case that epistemic reasons are separate from moral ones.

Note # 15 points out Aquinas’ statement that the spread of Christianity cannot be explained by naturalistic causes is “surely dubious” but doesn’t explain why. Can we expect an explanation later, or is assertion his style of argument?

Much time is spent criticizing Plantinga’s epistemology.

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: