Skip to content

In Defense of Natural Theology 4: David Hume on Meaning, Verification, and Natural Theology


The author makes a few challenges. First he looks at Hume’s assertions that statements like ‘God exists’ are meaningless. The author says that Hume used a theory of language and meaning that rules out pretty much everything including it’s own claims.

I think this may be true, as logical positivism is supposed to have been a failed theory of meaning and truth.

Next the author attacks Hume’s statements about the cosmological argument.

It’s important to note that the author is seemingly only showing that Hume’s arguments fail, not that these arguments succeed. I suspect that the rest of the book is going to address the success part. I’m also uncertain as to 1. how accurate the criticisms are, and 2. how pertinent to current critiques of theism they are.

Haven’t things changed since Hume? I guess the authors make an argument that people still appeal to Hume, so this book is therefore important.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: